Reservoir properties of drill cutting by the nuclear magnetic resonance relaxometry and dielectric spectroscopy data
https://doi.org/10.21285/2686-9993-2020-43-3-364-374
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to extend the use of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxometry and dielectric spectrometry methods. This is realized through a complex interpretation of the data by the above methods to timely provide additional petrophysical information about the drill cuttings pore space properties and structure. The relevance of the study is that the data on the drill cuttings obtained by the NMR method can be used as prior information in the logging data interpretation before a detailed petrophysical study of the core sample or in case of the core absence in the sampling interval. The objects of study are the drill cuttings samples from the fields of the West Siberian oil-and-gas province. The samples are saturated with different fluids, and their reservoir properties are determined by the nuclear magnetic resonance and dielectric spectrometry methods. As part of the experimental research, nuclear magnetic resonance investigations of the core samples of different discretization degrees have been carried out to determine the reservoir properties of the samples depending on the degree of their particle size reduction. It has been shown that the obtained results do not depend on the particle size of the measured sample and are consistent with the results of the standard petrophysical studies. The relationship between the porosity and the saturating fluid type has been established. Based on the data obtained by the dielectric spectroscopy method, the study has determined the value of the complex dielectric constant that shows how the degree of saturation changes depending on the fluid, and what happens in the pore space. The complex interpretation of the results obtained by the two methods provides additional information on the drill cuttings reservoir properties that can be used as a priori information on the formation properties.
About the Authors
A. A. MezinRussian Federation
Andrey A. Mezin, Junior Researcher of Laboratory of Multiscale Geophysics
3 Koptug Ave., Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
M. Y. Shumskayte
Russian Federation
Mariya Y. Shumskayte, Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Senior Researcher of Laboratory of Multiscale Geophysics
3 Koptug Ave., Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
V. N. Glinskikh
Russian Federation
Vyacheslav N. Glinskikh, Dr. Sci. (Phys. & Math.), Corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of Laboratory of Multiscale Geophysics
3 Koptug Ave., Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
N. A. Golikov
Russian Federation
Nikita A. Golikov, Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Senior Researcher of Laboratory of Multiscale Geophysics
3 Koptug Ave., Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
E. S. Chernova
Russian Federation
Elena S. Chernova, Master Degree Student
1 Pirogov St., Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
References
1. Akselrod SM. Up-to-date trends in geologic and engineering surveys (mud logging) while drilling (based on foreign publications). Karotazhnik. 2015;6:77–110. (In Russ.)
2. Beloray YaL, Kononenko IYa. Use of nuclear-magnetic researches for geoinformation support of well construction. Karotazhnik. 2006;1:53–65. (In Russ.)
3. Mezin AA, Shumskayte MY, Golikov NA, Burukhina AI. Relation of integrated dielectric permeability of oil with its physical and chemical properties and NMR characteristics. Geofizicheskie tekhnologii = Russian Journal of geophysical technologies. 2019;4:24–34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18303/2619-1563-2019-4-24
4. Shumskayte MY, Glinskikh VN. Relation of NMR parameters with specific surface and resistivity of shaly sandstone and siltstone samples: experimental study. Russian Geology and Geophysics. 2016;57(10):1509–1544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2016.01.019
5. Shumskayte MY, Glinskikh VN, Bortnikova SB, Kharitonov AN, Permyakov VS. NMR-relaxometry laboratory study of fluids carried out of boreholes. Izvestiya Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Inzhiniring georesursov = Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Assets Engineering. 2017;328(2):59–66. (In Russ.)
6. Howard JJ. Quantitative estimates of porous media wettability from proton NMR measurements. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 1998;16(5-6):529–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0730-725X(98)00060-5
7. Toumelin E, Torres-Verdin C, Bona N. Improving petrophysical interpretation with wide-band electromagnetic measurements. SPE Journal. 2008;13(2):205–215. https://doi.org/10.2118/96258-PA
8. Mirotchnik K, Kryuchkov S, Strack K. A novel method to determine NMR petrophysical parameters from drill cuttings. In: SPWLA 45 th annual logging symposium: proc. of the conf. Noordwijk; 2004. 15 p.
9. Korolev NYu, Kharisov RF, Stepanenkov LE. Evaluation of drilled-out rock filtration and capacity properties by a nuclear magnetic relaxation meter MST. Karotazhnik. 2009;9:332–340. (In Russ.)
10. Mukhidinov ShV, Ibragimova SV. Petrophysical investigations while drilling boreholes for the purpose of providing geologic interpretation of well logs. Karotazhnik. 2010;7:95–102. (In Russ.)
11. Kerimov AGG. Methods for assessing the porosity ratio of clay reservoirs in Paleogene sediments in the eastern Stavropol areas. Vestnik Severo-Kavkazskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta = Newsletter of North-Caucasus Federal University. 2007;4:5–9. (In Russ.)
12. Vavilin VA, Galiev TR, Kunakasov AA, Romanov YuK, Sorokina EV. NMR study of the pore space structure for the rocks of the fields with hard-to-extract reserves. In: Petrofizika slozhnykh kollektorov: problemy i perspektivy 2015 = Petrophysics of complicated reservoirs: problems and prospects 2015. Moscow: EAGE; 2015. p.259–274. (In Russ.)
13. Kovaleva LA, Minnigalimov RZ, Zinnatullin RR. Investigation of dielectric and rheological characteristics of water-oil emulsions. High Temperature. 2008;46(5):728–730. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0018151X08050210
14. Zinnatullin RR, Fatkhullina YuI, Kamaltdinov IM. Investigation of formation of an adsorption film by high-frequency dielectric spectrometry. High Temperature. 2012;50(2):298–299. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0018151X1202023X
15. Cosenza P, Ghorbani A, Revil A, Zamora M, Schmutz M, Jougnot D, et al. A physical model of the low-frequency electrical polarization of clay rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. 2008;113(B8):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005539
16. Lesmes DP, Morgan FD. Dielectric spectroscopy of sedimentary rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. 2001;106(B7):13329–13346. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JB900402
17. Martinez A, Byrnes AP. Modeling dielectric-constant values of geologic materials: an aid to ground-penetrating radar data collection and interpretation. Current Research in Earth Sciences. 2001;247(1):1–16.
18. Akselrod SM. New trends in dielectric logging (based on foreign publications). Karotazhnik. 2012;4:78–112. (In Russ).
19. Lapina AS, Bobrov PP, Golikov NA, Repin AV, Shumskayte MY. Hysteresis of the NMR response and the complex relative permittivity of the quartz granules powders and solid sandstones during the water imbibition and drainage. Measurement Science and Technology. 2017;28(1):014007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/28/1/014007
20. Coates J, Xiao L, Prammer M. NMR logging. Principles and applications. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company; 1999. 342 p.
Review
For citations:
Mezin A.A., Shumskayte M.Y., Glinskikh V.N., Golikov N.A., Chernova E.S. Reservoir properties of drill cutting by the nuclear magnetic resonance relaxometry and dielectric spectroscopy data. Earth sciences and subsoil use. 2020;43(3):364-374. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21285/2686-9993-2020-43-3-364-374