Preview

Earth sciences and subsoil use

Advanced search

Using proppant indentation coefficient in design of hydraulic fracturing treatment of oil source rocks

https://doi.org/10.21285/2686-9993-2022-45-3-305-312

Abstract

The purpose of the study is the laboratory determination of proppant indentation coefficients depending on the geological composition of the oil source rocks and their application in the design of hydraulic fracturing treatment. The laboratory researches used the core material of oil-producing deposits of the Domanic formation. The indentation of prop pant was carried out on the CTM-100 compression testing machine, in order to eliminate the measurement error, the size of the cells was additionally specified using ADF U300P microscope with the operation capacity either in reflected light or reflected and transmitted light only. As a result, the geological features of the Domanic complex were confirmed: a large content of organic matter was traced on the core material, the bulk of the rock was composed of carbonates with frequent lithological layering. The indentation coefficient of 20/40 proppan were as following: 0.2–0.4 mm in limestones, 0.23–0.45 mm in clay limestones, 0.47 mm for organic matter. The indentation coefficients for 30/50 proppant were as follows: 0.1– 0.5 mm in limestones, 0.13–0.55 mm in clay limestones, 0.47 mm in organic matter. The use of the obtained coefficients in the design of hydraulic fracturing treatment allowed to specify the fixed width of the crack opening that will have a positive effect on the predicted starting well yield under subsequent modeling. The proppant indentation is in direct relationship to the composition of the oil-producing rocks. When using the proppant coefficients it is advisable to pay additional attention to the proppant tracking map. The use of laboratory studies with subsequent modeling in the hydraulic fracturing simulator allows more accurate understanding of the fixed geometry of the crack of the formation fracturing. Estimation of the crack opening width at the stage of hydraulic fracturing design makes it possible to adapt the parameters of formation treatment, which has a positive effect on the lifetime of the crack width as well as on the well yield.

About the Authors

A. A. Nuriev
Ufa State Petroleum Technological University
Russian Federation

Arsen A. Nuriev - Postgraduate Student.

Ufa


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflicts of interests



Sh. Kh. Sultanov
Ufa State Petroleum Technological University; International Standard Research Center “Rational development of the planet's liquid hydrocarbon reserves”
Russian Federation

Shamil Kh. Sultanov - Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor, Professor of the Department of Geology and Exploration of Oil and Gas Fields, Ufa SPTU, Director ISRCR development  of the planet's liquid hydrocarbon reserves, SPIN: 7053-0235.

Ufa


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflicts of interests



References

1. Nuriev A. A., Kashapov D. V., Sultanov Sh. Kh. The results of the application of the obtained coefficients of indentation of the wedging material in the design of hydraulic fracturing for source rock. Vestnik evraziiskoi nauki = The Eurasian Scientific Journal. 2022;14(1). Available from: https://esj.today/PDF/23NZVN122.pdf [Accessed 3d June 2022]. (In Russ.).

2. Nuriev A. A. On the aspects of hydraulic fracturing in source rock. Neftegazovoe delo = Petroleum Engineering. 2022;20(1):39-44. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17122/ ngdelo-2022-1-39-44.

3. Sultanov Sh. Kh., Andreev V. E. An integrated approach to the development of major oil fields with hard-torecover reserves. Neftepromyslovoe delo = Oilfield engineering. 2009;3:13-16. (In Russ.).

4. Kashapov D. V., Fedorov A. E., Sergeychev A. V., Zeigman Yu. V. Evolution of multistage hydraulic fracturing technologies development at US shale facilities. Neftegazovoe delo = Petroleum Engineering. 2021;19(5):53-66. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17122/ngdelo-2021-5-53-66.

5. Valeev A. S., Kotenev Yu. A., Kotenev A. Yu., Mukhametshin V. Sh., Sultanov Sh. Kh. Efficiency enhancement of residual oil reserves recovery from low-productive reservoirs using gas and water-gas impact. Geologiya, geofizika i razrabotka neftyanykh i gazovykh mestorozhdenii = Geology, geophysics and development of oil and gas fields. 2019;7:59-64. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30713/2413-5011-2019-7(331)-59-64.

6. Takhauov A. A., Titov A. A. Study of the lithological characteristics of Domanic deposits of the Pervomayskoe field. Georesursy = Georesources. 2018;20(4):324-330. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18599/grs.2018.4.324-330.

7. Nesterova G. V., Yashchenko I. G., Nazarov L. A. Modeling the influence of the formation oil viscosity on specific resistivity distribution near the well and downhole measurements. In: Interekspo GEO-Sibir'-2013: materialy IX Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. “Nedropol'zovanie. Gornoe delo. Novye napravleniya i tekhnologii poiska, razvedki i razrabotki mestorozhdenii poleznykh iskopaemykh. Geoekologiya” = Interexpo GEO-Siberia-2013: proceedings of the 9th International scientific conference. “Subsoil use. Mining. New directions and technologies of prospecting, exploration and development of mineral deposits. Geoecology”. 15–26 April 2013, Novosibirsk. Novosibirsk; 2013, vol. 2, p. 137–140. (In Russ.).

8. Salimov O. V., Girfanov I. I., Ziyatdinov R. Z., Makhmutov I. K., Salimov V. G. Analysis of pilot hydrofrac, acid hydrofrac and large-volume bottomhole treatments in Mendymskian domanikites and Sargaevskian domanikoids. Territorija “Neftegas” = Oil and Gas Territory. 2017; 9:86-92. (In Russ.).

9. Zubkov M. Yu. Reservoir types in the BazhenovAbalak series of Western Siberia and their genesis. Geologiya nefti i gaza = Oil and gas geology. 2019;4:59-78. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31087/0016-7894-2019-4-59-78.

10. Zhdanov S. A. Experience of oil recovery enhancement methods implementation of in Russia. Neftyanoe khozyaistvo = Oil Industry. 2008;1:58-61. (In Russ.).

11. Kudryashov S. I., Bachin S. I., Afanasyev I. S., Latypov A. R., Sveshnikov A. V., Usmanov T. S., et al. Hydrofracturing as a way of low-permeable reservoirs development. Neftyanoe khozyaistvo = Oil Industry. 2006;7:80-83. (In Russ.).

12. Melikbekov A. S. Theory and practice of formation hydraulic fracturing. Moscow: Nedra; 1967. 140 p. (In Russ.).

13. Fedorova D. V., Astaf'ev A. A., Nadezhdin O. V., Latypov I. D. Petrophysical model of the Bazhenov formation of the Priobskoye field of Rosneft. Delovoi zhurnal Neftegaz. RU = Business magazine Neftegaz.RU. 2020;6: 76-84. (In Russ.).

14. Kravchenko M. N., Muradov A. V., Dieva D. N., Perekhozhev F. A. In-situ combustion and thermal-gaschemical formation treatment in the Bazhenov formation beds. Comparative analysis of the methods application based on mathematical modeling. Delovoi zhurnal Neftegaz.RU = Business magazine Neftegaz. RU. 2018;3:62-69. (In Russ.).

15. Karev V. I., Kovalenko Yu. F., Negomedzyanov V. R. Research and prediction of the stability of Bazhenov deposit horizontal wells drilled in depression. Tekhnologii toplivno-energeticheskogo kompleksa. 2004;5:18-23. (In Russ.).

16. Gluhmanchuk E. D., Krupizkyi V. V., Leontyevsky A. V. Bazhenov oil – "shale technology" and domestic experience production. Nedropolzovanie XXI vek = 21 Century Subsoil Use. 2015;7:32-37. (In Russ.).

17. Gladkov E. A. Preliminary results of testing new oil recovery technologies at the deposits of the Bazhenov Formation. Territorija “Neftegas” = Oil and Gas Territory. 2017;(7-8):50-57. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Nuriev A.A., Sultanov Sh.Kh. Using proppant indentation coefficient in design of hydraulic fracturing treatment of oil source rocks. Earth sciences and subsoil use. 2022;45(3):305-312. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21285/2686-9993-2022-45-3-305-312

Views: 287


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2686-9993 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7931 (Online)