Preview

Earth sciences and subsoil use

Advanced search

USE OF DIFFERENT FRACTURE ANALYSIS METHODS FOR TECTONIC STRESS FIELDS RECONSTRUCTION (ON EXAMPLE OF THE TAZHERAN INTRUSIVE MASSIF IN PRIBAIKALIE)

https://doi.org/10.21285/2541-9455-2018-41-3-35-49

Abstract

The Purpose of the paper is to carry out a complex analysis of fracturing and compare the results of two fundamentally different reconstruction methods of tectonic stress fields on the basis of geological and structural data of the Tazheran site in Pribaikalie. Methods. The study employs a new approach to the paragenetic analysis of statistical measurements of «mute» fracturing, which allows to restore the stressed state of a local rock volume and determine its belonging to the fault zone of a certain morphogenetic type and orientation. The second reconstruction method of stress fields is a kinematic method based on the analysis of fracture displacement vectors. Results. The analysis of 22 mass measurements of fracture attitude (100 joints each) and 158 measurements of slickensides at 16 observation points has been carried out. We have obtained 70 solutions of the paragenetic method and 26 solutions of the kinematic method on local stress fields. Fracture parageneses were formed in the fields of compression, shear and strike-slip in approximately equal amounts. The traces of displacements are more developed in strike-slip fields. A comparison of results for each observation point has showed that most of kinematic solutions (21 of 26) have a paragenetic solution similar in type and orientation for the stress field of the first or second order. Conclusions. The reconstruction results of local stress fields by two methods are comparable and in general complement and partially confirm each other. The identical stress fields restored by different methods are presumably referred to one stage. The other mainly paragenetic solutions indicate stress fields in the early development stages of small fault zones within the site. A complex use of paragenetic and kinematic methods is recommended.

About the Author

Y. Burzunova
Institute of the Earth’s Crust SB RAS
Russian Federation

Candidate of Geological and Mineralogical sciences, Leading Engineer of the Laboratory of Tectonophysics

128 Lermontov St., Irkutsk 664033, Russian Federation



References

1. Sherman S. I., Dneprovskii Yu.I. Polya napryazhenii zemnoi kory i geologostrukturnye metody ikh izucheniya [Earth crust stress fields and the geologicalstructural methods of their study]. Novosibirsk: Nauka Publ., 1989, 158 p. (In Russian).

2. Rebetskii Yu.L., Sim L.A., Marinin A.V. Ot zerkal skol'zheniya k tektonicheskim napryazheniyam. Metody i algoritmy [From slickenside to tectonic stresses. Methods and algorithms]. Moscow: GEOS Publ., 2017, 234 p. (In Russian).

3. Rastsvetaev L.M. Parageneticheskii metod strukturnogo analiza diz"yunktivnykh tektonicheskikh narushenii [Paragenetic method of structural analysis of disjunctive tectonic disturbances]. Problemy strukturnoi geologii i fiziki tektonicheskikh protsessov [Problems of structural geology and physics of tectonic processes]. Part 2. Moscow: Geological Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR Publ., 1987, pp. 173–235. (In Russian).

4. Gintov O.B. Polevaya tektonofizika i ee primenenie pri izuchenii deformatsii zemnoi kory Ukrainy [Field tectonophysics and its application to study Earth’s crust deformations in Ukraine]. Kiev: Feniks Publ., 2005, 572 p. (In Russian).

5. Lunina O.V., Gladkov A.S., Novikov I.S., Agatova A.R., Vysotskii E.M., Emanov A.A.. Geometry of the fault zone of the 2003 Ms=7.5 Chuya earthquake and associated stress fields, Gorny Altai. Tectonophysics, 2008, no. 453, pp. 276–294.

6. Seminskii K.Zh. Specialized mapping of crustal fault zones. Part 1: Basic theoretical concepts and principles. Geodinamika i tektonofizika [Geodynamics & Tectonophysics], 2014, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 445–467. https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2014-5-2-0136. (In Russian).

7. Seminskii K.Zh. Specialized mapping of crustal fault zones. Part 2: Main stages and prospects. Geodinamika i tektonofizika [Geodynamics & Tectonophysics], 2015, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–43. https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2015-6-1-0170. (In Russian).

8. Delvaux D. The TENSOR program for paleostress reconstruction: examples from the east African and the Baikal rift zones. Terra Nova, 1993, vol. 5, p. 216.

9. Delvaux D., Sperner B. Stress tensor inversion from fault kinematic indicators and focal mechanism data: the TENSOR program. In: New Insights into Structural Interpretation and Modelling / ed. D. Nieuwland. Geological Society London Special Publications, 2003, vol. 212, pр. 75–100.

10. Angelier J. From orientation to magnitudes in paleostress determinations using fault slip data. Journal of Structural Geology, 1989, vol. 11, pp. 37–50.

11. Burzunova Yu.P. Tazheran syenite massif fault zones (West Pribaikalie) by the results of structural paragenetic analysis of meso-fracturing. Izvestiya Sibirskogo otdeleniya sektsii nauk o Zemle Rossiiskoi akademii estestvennykh nauk. Geologiya, poiski i razvedka rudnykh mestorozhdenii [Proceedings of the Siberian Department of the Section of Earth Sciences, Russian Academy of Natural Sciences. Geology, Prospecting and Exploration of Ore Deposits], 2015, no. 1 (50), рр. 58–67. (In Russian).

12. Fedorovskii V.S., Sklyarov E.V., Mazukabzov A.M., Kotov A.B., Lavrenchuk A.V., Starikova A.E. Geologicheskaya karta massiva Tazheran [Geological map of the Tazheran massif]. Scale 1:10000. Moscow: Gruppa kompanii A1 TIS Publ., 2009. (In Russian).

13. Burzunova Yu.P. Rock fractures near faults: specific features of structural‐paragenetic analysis. Geodinamika i tektonofizika [Geodynamics & Tectonophysics], 2017, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 673–693. https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2017-8-3-0312. (In Russian).

14. Levi K.G., Miroshnitchenko A.I., San'kov V.A., Babushkin S.M., Larkin G.V., Badardinov A.A., Wong H.K., Colman S., Delvaux D. Active faults of the Baikal depression. Bulletin du Centre de recherches Elf Exploration Production, 1997, no. 21 (2), pp. 399–434.

15. Gushchenko O.I. Analysis of the orientations of the shear tectonic displacements and their tectonophysical interpretation under paleostress reconstruction. Doklady Akademii nauk SSSR [Proceedings of the USSR Academy of Sciences], 1973, vol. 210, no. 2, pp. 331–334. (In Russian).

16. Gushchenko O.I. Metod kinematicheskogo analiza struktur razrusheniya pri rekonstruktsii polei tektonicheskikh napryazhenii [Method of kinematic analysis of fracture structures under tectonic stress fields reconstruction]. Polya napryazhenii i deformatsii v litosfere [Fields of stresses and deformations in lithosphere]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1979, pp. 7–25. (In Russian).

17. Delvaux D., Moyes R., Stapel G., Petit C., Levi K., Miroshnitchenko А., Ruzhich V., San'kov V. Paleostress reconstruction and geodynamics of the Baikal region, Central Asia. Pt. II: Cenozoic rifting. Tectonophysics, 1997, vol. 282, pp. 1–38.

18. Seminskii K.Zh. Vnutrennyaya struktura kontinental'nykh razlomnykh zon. Tektonofizicheskii aspect [Internal structure of continental fault zones. Tectonophysical aspect]. Novosibirsk: Geo Publ., 2003, 243 p. (In Russian).

19. Hancock P.L. Brittle microtectonics: Principles and practice. Journal of Structural Geology, 1985, vol. 7, no. 3/4, pp. 437–457.


Review

For citations:


Burzunova Y. USE OF DIFFERENT FRACTURE ANALYSIS METHODS FOR TECTONIC STRESS FIELDS RECONSTRUCTION (ON EXAMPLE OF THE TAZHERAN INTRUSIVE MASSIF IN PRIBAIKALIE). Earth sciences and subsoil use. 2018;41(3):35-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21285/2541-9455-2018-41-3-35-49

Views: 294


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2686-9993 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7931 (Online)