Preview

Earth sciences and subsoil use

Advanced search

Results of 3D seismic surveying for hydrocarbons in the Gulf of Guinea

https://doi.org/10.21285/2686-9993-2024-47-4-430-441

EDN: ttltbo

Abstract

Seismic methods are among the most important tools in prospecting, exploration, evaluation and operation of oil and gas fields. The work includes three main stages: seismic data collection, their processing and interpretation. Seismic exploration can be carried out in 2D, 3D or 4D modifications. This study focuses on a 3D offshore seismic survey conducted in the deep shelf of the northern Gulf of Guinea in the Côte d’Ivoire Tano sedimentary basin. The purpose of the work is to assess the commercial prospects for discovering hydrocarbon deposits in the RUS-CIV block, identify the capabilities of seismic exploration, demonstrate effectiveness and sustainability of seismic analysis, which has been developed and improved over the years, achieving improved subsurface visualization results. The data providing reliable information on the seismogeological structure of the area under investigation have been obtained as a result of successive marine seismic operations in 2003–2009. A detailed study allowed to form objective ideas about the internal structure of the block, in particular about the layers of Cretaceous deposits. Also, data were obtained on the presence of a fault network in sedimentary rocks, possible hydrocarbon traps, the nature of pore pressures and the type of fluids. However, the conclusions made remain preliminary, have a qualitative nature and should be confirmed by additional analyses due to the fact that there are no drilled wells in the studied block. Based on the study results, the most promising areas have been identified for detailed interpretation based on the analysis of the dynamic characteristics of seismic waves, seismic exploration data and the choice of the exploration well location.

About the Authors

D. L. A. Onamoun
Irkutsk National Research Technical University
Russian Federation

Désiré Lucien Ayémoun Onamoun, Postgraduate Student,
Siberian School of Geosciences



A. G. Dmitriev
Irkutsk National Research Technical University
Russian Federation

Alexander G. Dmitriev, Dr. Sci. (Geol. & Mineral.), Professor,
Consulting Professor of the Geophysics Department,
Siberian School of Geosciences



References

1. Brownfield M.E., Charpentier R.R. Geology and total petroleum systems of the Gulf of Guinea province of West Africa: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2207-C. Reston: U.S. Geological Survey; 2006, 32 p.

2. Burrell A. Understanding tectonic development and the implications for prospectivity offshore Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana. First Break. 2024;42(5):53-58. https://doi.org/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2024039.

3. Basile C., Mascle J., Guiraud R. Phanerozoic geological evolution of the Equatorial Atlantic domain. Journal of African Earth Sciences. 2005;43(1-3):275-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2005.07.011.

4. Sandwell D.T., Müller R.D., Smith W.H.F., Garcia E., Francis R. New global marine gravity model from CryoSat-2 and Jason-1 reveals buried tectonic structure. Science. 2024;346(6205):65-67. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258213.

5. Martin G. Geologie des Küstengebietes von Nordwest-Africa südlich der Sahara. Neue Erkenntnisse aus der Erdölexploration Giessener Geologische Schriftenreihe. 1982;30:50. (In German).

6. Scarselli N., Duval G., Martin J., McClay K., Toothill S. Insights into the early evolution of the Côte d’Ivoire margin (West Africa). Geological Society, London, Special Publications. 2018;476:109-133. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP476.8.

7. Macgregor D., Robinson J., Spear G. Play fairways of the Gulf of Guinea transform margin. Geological Society, London, Special Publications. 2013;207(1):131-150. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2003.207.7.

8. Tissot B., Demaison P., Masson P., Delteil J.R., Conbaz A. Paleoenvironment and petroleum potential of Middle Cretaceous black shales in Atlantic Basins. AAPG Bulletin. 1980;64(12):2051-2063.

9. Dmitriev A.G., Dmitrieva M.A., Kovalev A.S. Dynamic range issues and image information content when visualizing seismic data. Earth sciences and subsoil use. 2024;47(1):6-16. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21285/2686-9993-2024-47-1-6-16. EDN: DQCZBW.

10. Zhang J. Pore pressure prediction from well logs methods modifications and new approaches. Earth-Science Reviews. 2011;108(1-2):50-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.06.001.

11. Prakash A., Subrata C. An innovative way of 3D velocity model building for PSDM Processing a case study from Andaman deep water basin, India. In: 11th Biennial International Conference and Exposition. Jaipur; 2015. Available from: https://spgindia.org/11_biennial_form/an-innovative-way-of-3d-velocity-model-building-for-psdm-processing-a-case-study-from-andaman-deep-water-basin-india-jaipur-2015.pdf [Accessed 15th May 2024].

12. Chopra S., Marfurt K.J. Seismic attributes – a historical perspective. Geophysics. 2005;70(5):3SO-28SO. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2098670.

13. Roque F., Vasconcellos G., Pontes R., Maul A., González Farías M. Assessment of depth positioning uncertainties for PSDM seismic data. In.: Fifteenth International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society. 31 July – 3 August 2017, Rio de Janeiro. Houston: SEG; 2017, p. 1813-1817. https://doi.org/10.1190/sbgf2017-357.

14. Birdus S., Ganivet V., Artemov A., Teakle R., Phythian P. Estimation of uncertainties in fault lateral positioning on 3D PSDM seismic image – example from the NW Australian shelf. In: 77th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2015. 1–4 June 2015, Madrid. Madrid: IFEMA; 2015, p. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201412730.

15. Polovnikov S.S., Tabrin V.L., Shabalin S.V. Kinematic processing of seismic data acquired in challenging seismic-and-geological environment. Vesti gazovoj nauki. 2018;3:315-321. (In Russ.). EDN: YVRBNZ.

16. Azhgaliev D.K., Isenov S.M., Karimov S.G. New opportunities for processing and interpreting seismic data in estimating the viability of local objects. News of the Ural State Mining University. 2019;1:48-59. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21440/2307-2091-2019-1-48-59. EDN: AGLKRL.

17. Stepanov I.Yu., Dorn E.V., Stepanov Yu.A. Preparation of initial seismic data for modeling tectonic fault in coal body. Mining informational and analytical bulletin (scientific and technical journal). 2024;5:5-16. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25018/0236_1493_2024_5_0_5. EDN: JJLUON.

18. Protasov M.I., Sorokin A.S., Khusnitdinov R.R., Fagereva V.A. The influence of the seismic data processing workflow on the quality of scattering waves images. In: Interjekspo GEO-Sibir’. XX Mezhdunarodnyj nauchnyj kongress. 15–17 May 2024, Novosibirsk: sb. materialov v 8 t. T. 2: Mezhdunarodnaja nauchnaja konferencija “Nedropol’zovanie. Gornoe delo. Napravlenija i tehnologii poiska, razvedki i razrabotki mestorozhdenij poleznyh iskopaemyh. Jekonomika. Geojekologija” = Interexpo GEO-Siberia. 20th International Scientific Congress, Novosibirsk, May, 15–17, 2024: colleced materials in 8 volumes. Volume 2: International Scientific Conference “Subsoil Use. Mining. Directions and Technologies for Prospecting, Exploration and Development of Mineral Deposits. Economy. Geoecology”. Novosibirsk: Siberian State University of Geosystems and Technologies; 2024, no. 4, p. 66-71. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33764/2618-981X-2024-2-4-66-71.

19. Smirnov A.S., Vakhromeev A.G., Erokhin G.N., Dmitriev A.G. Brine-bearing reservoirs prediction based on seismic data in the south of the siberian craton. Journal of geophysics. 2023;2:93-101. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.34926/geo.2023.18.86.011. EDN: OBKGUT

20. Petrochenko T.A., Zadoev A.Yu., Duchkov A.A., Mitrofanov G.M. Testing processing algorithms for seismic data from laboratory modeling. Russian Journal of Geophysical Technologies. 2022;2:107-117. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18303/2619-1563-2022-2-107. EDN: GLFSKA.


Review

For citations:


Onamoun D., Dmitriev A.G. Results of 3D seismic surveying for hydrocarbons in the Gulf of Guinea. Earth sciences and subsoil use. 2024;47(4):430-441. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21285/2686-9993-2024-47-4-430-441. EDN: ttltbo

Views: 141


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2686-9993 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7931 (Online)