Induced polarization effects comparison for galvanic and induction installations in transient electromagnetic methods
Abstract
The purpose of the work is to compare the anomalous responses from the IP-effects in transient electromagnetic methods for galvanic and induction installations. By a galvanic installation is meant one using a horizontal electric line in a "line-line" configuration, and by an induction installation, one using ungrounded contours in a "loop-loop" configuration. Registering the fast decaying induction-induced polarization (IIP) that occurs in the geo-environment in the presence of polarized objects, makes it possible to avoid false electrical resistivity anomalies and to find polarizability anomalies. The comparison is realized using numerical modeling within the one-dimensional model with a frequency dispersion of electrical resistivity (described by the Cole-Cole formula). The modeling has shown that the anomalous IP-effect for the galvanic installation is higher than the IIP effect for the induction installation. The IP effect contribution virtually does not decay with time, as opposed to the IIP effect.
About the Author
A. S. Bashkeev
Irkutsk National Research Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Assistant, Department of Applied Geology, Geophysics and Geoinformation Systems, Junior Researcher, Research Division
83, Lermontov St., Irkutsk, 664074, Russia
References
1. Van'yan LL. Electromagnetic sounding. Moscow: Nauchnyi mir; 1997. 219 p. (In Russ.)
2. Pospeev AV, Buddo IV, Agafonov YuA, Kozhevnikov NO. Reservoir identification in the sedimentary cover of South of Siberian platform with the use of non-stationary electromagnetic soundings data. Russian Geophysics. 2010;6:47–52. (In Russ.)
3. Stognii VV, Korotkov YuV. Prospecting for kimberlite bodies by the transient electromagnetic method. Novosibirsk: Malotirazhnaya tipografiya 2D; 2010. 121 p. (In Russ.)
4. Sharlov MV, Buddo IV, Misyurkeeva NV, Shelokhov IA, Agafonov YuA. Experience of effective study of the upper part of the section by near-field transient electromagnetic sounding method with FastSnap system. Devices and systems of Exploration Geophysics. 2017;2(60):8–23. (In Russ.)
5. Stognii VV. Transient electromagnetic prospecting on investigations of induced polarization effects in frozen ground of Yakutian kimbcrlitc province. Kriosfera Zemli = Earth cryosphere. 2008;12(4):46–56. (In Russ.)
6. Vanhala H, Peltoniemi M. Spectral IP studies of Finnish ore prospects. Geophysics. 1992;57(12):1545–1555.
7. Ageev VV. Induced polarization processes study for geocryological tasks solution. Prospect and protection of mineral resources. 2012;11:46–49. (In Russ.)
8. Kozhevnikov NO, Antonov EYu. Pulse-inductive electrical exploration of polarized media. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal = Geophysical Journal. 2009;31(4):104–118. (In Russ.)
9. Kozhevnikov NO. Fast-decaying inductive IP in frozen ground. Russian Geology and Geophysics. 2012;53(4):527–540. (In Russ.)
10. Komarov VA. On the nature of inducedpolarization electric fields and the possibility of their use in prospecting ore deposits. Vestnik Leningradskogo universiteta. Geologiya i geografiya = Bulletin of the Leningrad University. Geology and geography. 1957;6:29–40. (In Russ.)
11. Legeido PYu, Mandel'baum MM, Rykhlinskii NI. The use of differential-normalized electrical exploration in the Nepa arch. Russian Geology and Geophysics. 1990;4:86–91. (In Russ.)
12. Legeido PYu, Mandel'baum MM, Rykhlinskii NI. Differentially normalized electrical survey method in direct exploration for deposits. Russian Geophysics. 1995;4:42–45. (In Russ.)
13. Davydenko YuA, Aikasheva NA, Bashkeev AS, Faustova AYu, Bogdanovich DV. Results of the pulse electrical survey application in prospecting ore mineral deposits in the mountainous Altai. Inzhenernaya i rudnaya geofizika 2018: sbornik statei XIV nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii i vystavki = Engineering and mining geophysics in 2018: 14th Science-to-practice conference and exhibition, 23–27 April 2018, Almaty. 8 p. Available from: http://www.earthdoc.org/publication/publicationdetails/?publication=91717 [Accessed 3d September 2019].
14. Bashkeev AS, Davydenko YuA. The “Mars” electromagnetic hardware-software complex architecture. Voprosy estestvoznaniya = Natural Science Questions. 2016;3(11):35–43. (In Russ.)
15. Ryzhov AA. The optimal algorithm for solving the direct problem of VES. Fizika Zemli = Earth Physics. 1983;3:68–76. (In Russ.)
16. Pesterev IYu. One-dimensional inversion program “Mars1D”. Certificate of authorship RF, no. 2012660743; 2012. (In Russ.)
17. Cole KS, Cole RH. Dispersion and absorption in dielectrics. Alternating current characteristics. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1941;9:341–351.
18. Pelton WH, Ward SH, Hallof PG, Sill WR, Nelson PH. Mineral discrimination and removal of inductive coupling with multifrequency IP. Geophysics. 1978;43:588–609.
Review
For citations:
Bashkeev A.S. Induced polarization effects comparison for galvanic and induction installations in transient electromagnetic methods. Earth sciences and subsoil use. 2019;42(3):303-311. (In Russ.)
Views:
219
Email this article 
Post a Comment 
