Features of distance learning by the disciplines in the Earth Sciences direction at a technical university
https://doi.org/10.21285/2686-9993-2020-43-4-499-509
Abstract
About the Authors
L. A. RapatskayaRussian Federation
Larisa A. Rapatskaya, Cand. Sci. (Geol. & Mineral.), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Applied Geology,Geophysics and Geoinformation Systems
83 Lermontov St., Irkutsk 664074
V. I. Snetkov
Russian Federation
Vyacheslav I. Snetkov, Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Head of the Department of Applied Geology, Geophysics and Geoinformation Systems
83 Lermontov St., Irkutsk 664074
References
1. Perry W. The Open University. Proceedings of the Royal Institution of Great Britain. 1971;44(203): 95–112.
2. Kiyan IV. Analysis of international experience of distance learning. Energobezopasnost' i energosberezhenie = Energy Safety and Energy Economy. 2010;6:32–36. (In Russ.)
3. Vodolad SN, Zaikovskaya MP, Kovaleva TV, Savel'eva GV. Distance learning at the university. Uchenye zapiski. Elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal Kurskogo gosudarstvennogo universi-teta = Scientific Notes: The online academic journal of Kursk State University. 2010;1:129– 138. Available from: http://scientific-notes.ru/#new-number?id=13 [Accessed 25th August 2020]. (In Russ.)
4. Barnard-Brak L, Sulak T, Tate A, Lechtenberger D. Measuring college students' attitudes toward requesting accommodations: a national multi-institutional study. Assessment for Effective Intervention. 2010;35(3):141–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508409358900
5. Burgstahler S, Corrigan B, McCarter J. Making distance learning courses accessible to students and instructors with disabilities: a case study. The Internet and Higher Education. 2004;7(3):233–246. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.06.004
6. Bonk СJ, Lee МM, Reynolds Т. A special passage through Asia e-learning. International Journal on E-Learning. 2009;8(4):438–445.
7. Ovsyannikov VI. The structure of distance education. In: Distance education in Russia. Problem statement and organization experience. Moscow: Al'fa; M.A. Sholokhov Moscow State Open Pedagogical University; 2001. p.51. (In Russ.)
8. Demkin VP, Rudenko TV, Serkova NV. Psychological and pedagogical features of distance education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2000;3:124–128. (In Russ.)
9. Polat ES, Petrov AE. Distance learning: what should it be. Pedagogika. 1999;7:29–34. (In Russ.)
10. Shakhmaev NM. Technical means of distance learning. Moscow: Znanie; 2000. 276 p. (In Russ.)
11. Salykhova DR. Organization of distance learning in Moodle. Molodoi uchenyi = Young Scientist. 2015;6: 207–210.
12. Andreev AA, Soldatkin VI. Distance learning: subject matter, technology, organization. Moscow: Moscow State University of Economics, Statistics and Informatics; 1999. 196 p. (In Russ.)
13. Sadanova BM, Oleinikova AV, Al'berti IV, Odintsova EA, Plekhanova EN. Using the potential of virtual laboratories in the educational process of technical high schools. Molodoi uchenyi = Young Scientist. 2016;4:71–74. (In Russ.)
14. Cheremisina EN, Antipov OE, Belov MA. A role of a virtual computer laboratory based on technologies of cloud calculations in up-to-date computer education. Distantsionnoe i virtual'noe obuchenie. 2012;1:50–64. (In Russ.)
15. Simanovsky AE. Use of distance technologies to teach disabled students. Yaroslavskii pedagogicheskii vestnik. 2012;4:238–240. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Rapatskaya L.A., Snetkov V.I. Features of distance learning by the disciplines in the Earth Sciences direction at a technical university. Earth sciences and subsoil use. 2020;43(4):499-509. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21285/2686-9993-2020-43-4-499-509